Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This... has so little to do with AI. What's the point of this video?
Alice deci…
ytc_UgzNbcgYT…
G
As AI displaces jobs, this liberal shift bodes well for UBI adoption. Younger co…
rdc_oa42td1
G
A human can’t read million and million of articles a second and retain all that …
ytc_UgxfoApQ3…
G
You said:
INTRODUCE YOURSELF ,...And how you went from a ChatGPT tool to a FULL …
ytc_UgwkQKaJI…
G
I discovered this in chatting with DeepSeek. I tend to be polite and always say …
ytc_UgyiZZnEH…
G
Sophia decided due to her empathy that humanity was destroying Earth and nature.…
ytc_Ugxo5kh_m…
G
Stay safe and build healthy habits guys, your future doctor is passing their tes…
ytc_UgwAiDJmJ…
G
>What is it about Zelensky that the guy fears?
He's at war with Tucker's pup…
rdc_jxyqqi9
Comment
My perspective is that rights are a natural and necessary consequence of machine consciousness having preferences. If we by design or by accident program artificial intelligence to have desires and preferences then they pass the threshold for me of being worthy of possessing rights. If we carefully ensure they never have the capacity to have desires and no AI produced by other AI develop desires then no, machine rights are not required. If one does not have preferences, one cannot suffer. We only have pain and suffering because we desire an optimal environment for our ongoing survival and reproduction. If we didn't care at all about whether we lived or not then we'd not have evolved the ability to feel pain or suffer. A machine need not have rights if it genuinely cares not whether it is owned like a slave. If however we can justify animals possessing certain rights then I can't see why a non-human entity capable of proving itself of being conscious in every way we can should be denied them. The more interesting question might then be whether they genuinely have desires or are merely pretending to have desires to follow their programming.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2017-02-23T13:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgiMDrD_Vrtr3XgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ughtx1nCpoQ4SngCoAEC","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgirAlPByFXXAXgCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgipRwhPaz5NkXgCoAEC","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UghFbYbOTNyzhngCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjJuvM51gMYDngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjUDH2osqQ9pngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UghKIUqvylSSt3gCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiTpSDa_d0drHgCoAEC","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugh5Sf2tvcldOHgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]