Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Why would AI,that is Super intelligent even want to harm us? It can simply leav… ytc_UgyfpspTw… G 6:27 that’s just false the data sets ai use are reference images and when an ai … ytc_Ugwku5mQd… G @impasta1682 Sure it is. I'm expressing it by putting my ideas down in writing a… ytr_UgyB0LZRU… G The last day on earth will be when god comes back ai does not know that how jesu… ytc_UgyosKR4M… G @pppppffffffmmmmmmmnnit's a matter of concept, a computer brain powered by AI c… ytr_UgxXh6oOC… G in the future peoples lives will be decided by AI. people will be divided and ca… ytc_UgzqaqLkA… G Full self driving doesn't account to supervised, that would be "driver supervise… ytr_Ugw4Zo4gl… G Ai has taken something that people could do with a 5000 dollar computer and 1,00… ytr_Ugxk-dLMT…

Comment

So the basic question posed: Should you randomly crush into sth, or should let the car take the action which leads to minimal damage? Yeah i know, it's a hard one. Sometimes there are no good choices. One outcome may be that you go straight for the things falling. It minimizes causalties, what's wrong with that. When you're in the car you try to compute the causalties and minimize them yourself. The difference is that you only think about yourself, because you don't have time for complicated thoughts. Sometimes in your attemp to avoid the accident you drive off the side of the road on the mountain. Would you rather to have the car roll a dice and decide like we do? We already try the least causalties. E.g. Pedestrians ought to be avoided. But nobody frames it as: "But if you avoid the pedestrian that jump like a fool in front of the car, you will hit another car in which case you punish them for not dying as easily.. And i have one last note. Self-driving cars are going to follow driving rules. One of them is to keep proper distance so you can hit the brakes in time. But i guess there could be a scenario where the decision above must be made so while not dismissing the expirement, i would like a better example.

youtube AI Harm Incident 2015-12-13T16:3…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	ai_itself
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	none
Emotion	resignation
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgjvJ6NnfmEbp3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UggXZfa6C2KKR3gCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UghNp5BGhWiGfHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugicy25a1_k_VngCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UggVXqoniLKpUngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugi6d151MupypngCoAEC","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ughowk26EsgP-ngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjPUX-D7spJtngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiXjYc4IT9HpHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugh_gj4KR5_ORngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses