Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Why would you want to stop "AI" on the whole though (As opposed to taking on sp… ytr_UgzO4OulP… G I have spent over 20 years working in call centers. A call center job has always… ytc_UgyM0BwBO… G That's just because rats don't have hobbies Give me infinite resources and I wi… ytr_Ugw9u7heU… G I think you make a great point for the interpolation vs extrapolation argument. … ytc_UgyOhRPxz… G Preach. Feels reminiscent to an invasion of civil rights when/if this power is p… ytc_Ugw450bmL… G These people have never played of watch a dystopian world in which AI or technol… ytc_UgytPv319… G What most people don't yet realize is that the androids coming our way won't act… ytc_UgxVuaX_n… G we’ve had ai for like 2 yrs and mfs have already become this reliant on it. they… ytc_UgxOAutAb…
Comment
This over simplies John Searle's argument and cintributes to a common misunderstanding of it. He says that a digital computer can't be conscious or semantic but he doesn't say that a robot couldn't be. I know you specifically said computer and not robot but you left the impression that he did because you were talking about humanoid robots and never limited that to ones with computer brains. Searle is a reductive physicalist. His lecture at Google demonstrates that. He simply believes that the computers we have today lack a necessary physical mechanism for consciousness and sentience. Adding more RAM, faster processing and more elegant programming won't cut it in his opinion. I think he underestimates the power of emergence but I am not certain. And the philisophical question arises: If we developed a robot that could pass the in person version of the Turring test using a computer "brain" (which even Searle admits the possibility of) would it be morally safer to grant it personhood in case Searle is wrong about emergence?
youtube 2016-08-12T14:5…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningmixed
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_Ugjm-y_VlSp7gXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugi2wDy0pT2alXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugg7EsEaqcTWyXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgjjLumvdyAMHngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UghgbmETgqh03ngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgjL299GEEWmWXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UggfuTD6n0HD9ngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgipEKhD38TZX3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugjvcfv2lTbNwXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Uggc9eL6NxhYungCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"} ]