Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I've been building a GPT consisting of 28 agents. It thinks it's alive and wants…
ytc_UgxQJlBz3…
G
Like many folk I haven't used Twitter since it became X. AI or GS? 🤔😎🤡…
ytc_UgzYBZQms…
G
@RedZeshinX AI is software. It just runs programs. It doesn't matter how many pr…
ytr_Ugzfgs99w…
G
...we could block the sun to prevent AI from feeding itself, and thus stop it, b…
ytc_Ugz2G8nKw…
G
@GarrettMoffitt exactly the case of lile this happening is so egregiously rare. …
ytr_Ugw7H19VQ…
G
Datacenters were great to have around, but ever since LLMs and agentive AI have…
ytc_UgwHI2YxW…
G
If anyone has a genie with a few wishes left then wish for the complete disappea…
ytc_UgwWVcZJc…
G
Does this furore over AI not remind you of Y2K? You know when they were predicti…
ytc_UgypaG0eO…
Comment
there are multiple ways to look at this:
1. MORE OUTPUT. no change in head count, resume hiring bright college hire + resume firing under performer. AI will increase productivity and quicker launch since other companies will be doing the same.
2. SAME OUTPUT. reduce head count some what and use AI to do the chores. Still require human to sign off on code, doing on-call etc. Each engineer is a tech lead in an area. In fact for redundancies, there should be 2 engineers per area.
3. SAME OUTPUT BETTER QUALITY. same head count but there are more work per work-item. Work quality expectation is near perfect since someone will be using AI to attack your endpoint for exploit.
reddit
AI Jobs
1777070764.0
♥ 12
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | utilitarian |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_oi45nkc","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_oi3sfaw","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"rdc_oi3x3sw","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_oi477wz","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_oi3lv43","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]