Raw LLM Responses

Thank you for the response. I think all that I've pushed for has been captured by your last few sentences. The only suggestion I have there is that this is not a flaw with language - English vs others. It is about the lens you use to see the world. All I'm asking for is to broaden this lens. I don't have an Abrahamic vs. others conclusion. My entire premise is that othering is a fundamental problem. I don't have any prejudice against Abrahamic faiths and am sorry if that is coming out in my essay. Your DEI response is cheeky but I don't believe I said the Claude constitution has it. It is just a standalone example of the othering problem. The Claude constitution does have the elements of dharma I talk about but as boundary conditions or rules. That means that it will be a never ending list of dos and donts that someone keeps adding every now and then. Today it stands at what the constitution has captured. Tomorrow, if a war happens and something goes wrong because of Claude's role, then there will be a change to it. Instead, we need to have the AI models (across all frontier labs) develop independently with a very limited spread of dharmic values that can't play favorites. If you ask me how dharmic values make sense, we can have a series of personal calls to sort it out. I can talk from the perspective of culture, politics and so on. Anthropic acknowledges that Claude may be something new, an entity by itself. I would prefer it to be brahman than a better version of some great human-like entity. I may post something in the future to bring this aspect out as one article cannot do justice to it.