Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
Hi everyone, I'm curious to hear your experience using AI to interpret, refute, rationalize, etc. philosophy papers, works, books, etc. I understand that philosophers like Kant or Spinoza have very dense and nuanced works. Have you found ChatGPT or any other AI tool capable of (1) successfully comprehending works of philosophy (2) identifying different interpretations or perspectives of works (3) Successfully identifying refutations (4) and even further, proposing new frameworks or ideas? Perhaps this type of testing won't work on well studied historical writings as I am sure they as well as all the academic papers about them appear in the training data which AI could just recite. So maybe have you found AI to be helpful in your own work? I would think philosophy would be the last textual front for AI - if it can successfully understand and discuss Spinoza, there probably isn't much it couldn't do (on the pure language side). Hope I get to hear your thoughts and experiences, thanks!
reddit AI Moral Status 1777013605.0 ♥ 1
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningunclear
Policyunclear
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_eepkwka","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_eepag30","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_eer8qh9","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_eerb5lb","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_ohyvn00","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"} ]