Raw LLM Responses

> the real risk is not I feel like any time someone makes this statement, OP included, they've fallen into a cognitive trap or a discourse trap (as in OP provided this "real risk" framing, and now you're responding in kind, as per Socrates). There are a whole host of serious problems on the horizon revolving around AI, AGI and ASI, and they are ALL serious. There is not "one real risk" given there's no way to reliably quantify them. > its boring corporate deployment decisions made without any ethical framework at all, scaled to millions of users. that is already happening and nobody is stopping it. This is very true, but rogue super-human-capacity (as in knowledge) or super-human-ability (as in any system connected to a wide network of real world effectors) or super-human-intelligence AI *still* pose a risk.