Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
As an example, any time the Daily Mail gets caught peddling falsehoods, they stealth edit the article instead of posting a clear correction. The article notes the New York Times did something similar in 2016 Other times media just yank the article entirely. And frankly, the excuse about AI scraping "their" content is a bit rich since newsrooms were gutted 30 years ago and the majority of content they post is refashioned articles from Reuters and AP News or -- worse -- refashioned template articles send in by lobbying groups. The latter became clear about 15 years ago -- I can no longer find the blog post -- when someone used the longest common-subsequence algorithm typically used to DNA fragments and instead applied it to newspaper articles to recover the original source they had all minimally edited to create "their" content.
reddit Viral AI Reaction 1776681699.0 ♥ 665
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyliability
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_ohs32sl","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_oh8isnv","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_ohaqwmb","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_oh9ygq9","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_oh902wd","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"} ]