Raw LLM Responses

>Ummm I understand the sentiment but anthropic took a $200 million dollar contract with the pentagon back in July, so what the fuck makes them so saintly now. >Because there 2nd round of negotiations failed and now they get to make a principled stand when they already got there bag of blood money??? >Choose whatever platform fits for your ideology but this is performative bs from anthropic. Ignore the idiot who wrote this, must not have complete information or something. Anthropic has always leaned in to the military, that's not the issue. The issue are the two sticking points where anthropic says the current SOTA models have a baseline error rate that, while low, makes it unfit for the curial decision of Autonomously acquiring and subsequently killing said target with no human in the loop. Even a 5% unreliability rate would look DEVESTATING on the battle field in terms of collateral damage to innocents. The tech isn't there yet. That's all anthropic is saying The other was they didn't want it being used to perform dragnet surveillance on American citizens. And they stood on bidnez. They just lost $200 million in contracts plus being shunned from the government. That's not performative