Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This sounds like bullshit, but the point is that machines are nowhere closely ad…
ytc_UgyDRLnnU…
G
Yeah, I mean it isn't really shocking that AI and it's "creations" are soulless.…
ytr_UgzjcVAFF…
G
Thank you for sharing 🙏🏿
Prayers going out for you all and your loved ones 🕊️🥛🍯…
ytc_UgyRlppcV…
G
It strikes me as hilarious, the way so many people assume that we're very close …
ytc_UgxFwg6lQ…
G
You guys should pls stop with this artificial intelligence stuff this might get…
ytc_Ugx5y-23V…
G
These AI guys always say it can cure cancer. If that's true, go do that and lea…
ytc_Ugznghy-h…
G
I always have said please and thank you to AI just in the off chance my Alexa’s …
ytc_Ugx8otYWW…
G
the only thing that ai is gonna take over is online so everybody that works onli…
ytc_Ugz4kLk7C…
Comment
Check your bankruptcy paperwork. Look on the secured creditors page. Your attorney should have listed the creditor as a regular debt that you wanted to surrender and it would have been wiped away in the bankruptcy. It is correct that the creditor could not show up to take the car right away during the bankruptcy without getting permission (filing a separate motion). But they could have certainly done that - it happens every day. Or your attorney could have negotiated the return with your permission. It's weird that the creditor never followed up. Perhaps you kept paying and the creditor got confused?
If you did *not* list the car as a surrender in the bankruptcy, then you would indeed be responsible for the debt and you will want to stay on the creditor's good side.
Edit: I guess the important thing here is whether you listed that you wanted to keep or surrender the car during the bankruptcy.
reddit
AI Bias
1772301515.0
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:06:44.921194 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_o7uzv3e","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"rdc_o7whylp","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_o7ww7v8","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_o7wypmn","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_o81btnc","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}
]