Raw LLM Responses

It really won't matter. Studios will start creating fake actors and eventually you won't have a desire to see specific actors in movies. Think about the cost of headlining actors, right now they serve to somewhat give credibility to a movie on top of the likeability of specific actors. For example, Tom Cruise movies have a specific standard where most people like any movie he is in. Is it him specifically driving anything special into the role? Partially, but after time you realize that if he's in it that he, his team, and the production teams have not just vetted the movie/story but that they are willing to sink the large salary required for someone at his level. IMO it's going to lead to actors salaries diminishing significantly in the short term (5 years) with the eventual state of production companies and studios not wanting to sink that kind of money into large productions because they can produce it at 1/100000th the cost without them. My guess is you will have some big features that will still have human actors, and that there will be some backlash from people not wanting to see "ai", but it just takes a few really well-done movies to offset that. Long term I don't think it's the death of Hollywood as much as it will be a death of movie stars and all the thousands of jobs that go into producing a movie. Think about all of the work that goes into sets/lighting/catering/etc, if we transition to ai based movies (and I think its not an if, but a when), those jobs will dry up overnight as well. Hollywood will survive and the stories will either be the win or loss of the studio generating the production. Will ai be able to generate those stories and screenplays? Without question. Will humans be involved at fine tuning? Sure, and ai will train based on what is chosen and what doesn't work.