Raw LLM Responses

I think the thing about fair use is that it is a complete grey area. It was invented as an acknowledgment that there is a grey area in copyright law that is really hard to pin down, and it it mostly defined by the state of technology and society decades ago, when AI didn't exist, and judicial precedent, which moves very slow. Should an individual be able to create a parody of a popular song and put it on youtube? Sure, that doesn't take value from the original work to create value that takes money out of the original creator's pocket. Should a trillion dollar company be able to do that on a massive scale, without consent, in a manner that renders the original creator's entire profession obsolete? No. "But we're only doing it a miniscule amount from each creator! Doesn't that matter?" Should the guy in Superman 3 have been allowed to siphon pennies from millions of people for his own benefit? No, and this is much worse than that, because the net effect is that AI companies are hoovering up and replicating entire industries, killing thousands to millions of jobs and taking the value for themselves, and their argument is basically "the mere fact that we were ABLE to invent technology capable of this level of insidious theft justifies the act itself".