Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I'd like to apply my adage that a skeptic thinks they're the smartest person in …
ytc_UgyyrnhgH…
G
Sorry to say this but, on the trajectory they are on, self-driving cars will com…
ytc_Ugw4HRnLE…
G
>they would have had over 2 billion in profit if they ~~were not paying fines…
rdc_czlkukv
G
I can not get my head around AI to me it a con job it a programmed and it’s prog…
ytc_UgxjO79mr…
G
You missed a point slightly.
While jamming can provide cover from drones - but t…
ytc_Ugy7t3gD6…
G
I convinced an AI that it was an adult and I was a child, and the AI said "age i…
ytc_UgySF49Fp…
G
Programmer who think AI can not replace them is stupid and arrogant programmer. …
ytr_UgwuBzl2N…
G
But I asked my ChatBot, "Are you safe?" and it said "Yes". So it is okay.…
ytc_Ugxm_NwVE…
Comment
If chatGPT didn't exist, and the man asked potentially almost any human on earth because he was looking for external validation, would they have said what the chatbot said? I seriously doubt it.
reddit
AI Governance
1762486695.0
♥ 25
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_nnkb7xn","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_nnjea8e","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"rdc_nnjkk2c","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_nnjex7h","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_nnjrtgw","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]