Raw LLM Responses

Unfortunately, this is nothing new. It's far from settled law - there have been rulings both in favor of and against biometric data being covered by the 4th and 5th Amendments. But more often than not, courts have ruled that biometrics are not covered. [https://www.purduegloballawschool.edu/blog/constitutional-law/fifth-amendment-biometrics](https://www.purduegloballawschool.edu/blog/constitutional-law/fifth-amendment-biometrics) Basically the logic is that scanning your face is not prying into any of the facts of your life and thus not violating your expectation of privacy. So they can force you to provide a face scan or fingerprint to unlock your phone but not to provide a password as that is considered testimonial and covered by the 5th Amendment. If one of these cases goes before the US Supreme Court, I think we already know which way they would rule on it...