Raw LLM Responses

>But ask any developer - they do not hold up in large, complex codebases because they cannot reason. But ask any executive and they'll tell you whatever the AI shits out is good enough when it means that's fewer employees they have to actually pay. What people forget is that executives do not care about the quality of the work and they do not care about negative customer experience because many of these companies are too big to fail at this point and customers will stick with them despite the drop in quality because there aren't any better options. Hell, we've already been seeing this in the tech industry with offshore contractors. Just like with AI, ask just about any developer and they'll tell you offshore contractors frequently suffer the same problem: inability to reason. I've been a developer for 13 years and 90% of offshore contractors I've worked with fall apart completely if presented with something that falls outside of a norm or has any complexity beyond a set template because the way these people are educated is to follow extremely set instructions, not how to actually reason through a problem. Their education comes from what are effectively employee mills, not actual schooling or any method that teaches them to understand the material. Despite that, I saw the company I worked for cutting on-site staff year after year and bringing in more contractors until I was finally cut and while I won't tell you what company it is, I can guarantee you they aren't going anywhere anytime soon and have suffered no consequences for this. AI can operate at the level of an offshore contractor which we've already seen the precedent that the decision makers at these companies think that's good enough.