Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
why is nobody mentioning the fact that the AI bro is using ableist slurs? that m…
ytc_UgxmvpXXh…
G
It would be smarter, instead of trying to achieve singularity like it's some Ape…
ytc_Ugxev-pyK…
G
we should call it AIC?
i was refering to characters made by Gachalife or whatev…
ytr_UgwL0ZSvv…
G
Ai artist basically just sound like "Ai can draw, make music and do all the othe…
ytc_Ugxc0bWHP…
G
We need to have AI personal security agents. That can actively. Clean online pro…
ytc_Ugxqk3FBI…
G
Im not in law but a peer of mine was bragging to me that they used ChatGPT to ci…
ytc_Ugx0bXl3H…
G
I've been concerned with the unknown dangers of this nascent technology and its …
ytc_Ugxm69bJz…
G
I like the version where AI takes all the jobs, and the value produced is distri…
ytc_UgygPQVMc…
Comment
I really need 40 or 4.1 back.I am a ChatGPT Plus subscriber (a paying customer), l've already paid, and they still limits my gpts usage cap. Are they crazy?Now I cancel my subscription until you bring back 4.0 and other models.
reddit
AI Responsibility
1754645331.0
♥ 18
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_n7li7fd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_n7kl7g0","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_n7kky28","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_n7ki0t9","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_n7lavg9","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]