Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I would never want a self driving car bc the feeling of driving a normal car is …
ytc_UgyhzcJtL…
G
A lot of things to be scared about and for good reason. I would like to say thou…
ytc_UgyWzNL4_…
G
Love your art and vids. Always glad to see someone fighting back against the AI …
ytc_Ugyu_Opz8…
G
As a typical consumer like 99% of the population, I would go for the best art, a…
ytr_UgxG0h8m7…
G
I agree there is a better way to get to AGI and they are brute forcing the curre…
ytc_UgwBqvhkM…
G
@destineybailey6890it’s pure evil is what it is ! You can’t re-create life Satan…
ytr_Ugz2V8KTn…
G
Self driving car : 0 accident future; but, less accidents than future; ahh its a…
ytc_UgzqmbY_p…
G
This moment when you realize that this robot (with a superior A.I) could erase h…
ytc_Ugjb84FZu…
Comment
They could have implemented an AI monitoring system for cheaper, and probably more reliably with a clustering algorithm.
But the point is not to just come up with a solution, its to come up with an LLM based solution. Every tech company is focusing their efforts on making LLM’s viable as a product.
Ive recently worked on a POC for an embedded LLM-based game (think classic school children’s game), involving receiving user image data as input, prompting the model to analyze the image and respond with some definitive output about the image.
It fails more than 50% of the time. It would probably be better to just implement a coin-flip instruction instead of prompting the model.
I could also just use openCV to do the image recognition, slap a “powered by AI” label on the app, and the customer wouldnt know the difference. Nobody would play the game either way. But thats not the point. We are just trying to figure out what kind of products we can build on top of an LLM, and so far, its a goose-egg.
reddit
AI Jobs
1753902410.0
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_n610om9","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_n611vaw","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_n6145hz","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_n61rjul","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_n6264z9","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"}
]