Raw LLM Responses

They did in his bum frankly. I don’t believe that for one minute. > AI has a huge confidentiality problem for starters. Big issue for lawyers > It also has an issue admitting it doesn’t know something. > And making shit up. > so anything it produced would have to be heavily checked by someone more senior who has better shit to do honestly than checking motions and talking an ai through the fixes. There’s no way any prominent law firm is trusting generational of vital work to ai. Plus every large law firm in particular is conscious of the need for new lawyers to take the firm forward So I’m calling total bs on that claim. Now I do think it has huge potential. If you could build it into the tech we already have it could greatly reduce the amount of time it takes to do dumb shit. Not sure you’d ever trust it with cutting edge research however, as so much depends on subjective experienced judgment and it is ultimately a derivative language tool. It also has potential to create judicial access for low value but v straightforward claims which are so annoying to so many people and can’t be done at a price that makes sense currently.