Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
https://utkarshkanwat.com/writing/betting-against-agents/ > Let's do the math. If each step in an agent workflow has 95% reliability, which is optimistic for current LLMs,then: >5 steps = 77% success rate >10 steps = 59% success rate >20 steps = 36% success rate I don't believe throwing a hundred million GPUs at the problem is going to solve these problems. It's diminishing returns. Even at 98%, or 99%, it's not really good enough. Also factor in if you have agents working together, you are replicating the "mythical man-month" problem of adding enormous amounts of communication overhead where even more mistakes are made. Endless work in a few years to fix all this stuff.
reddit AI Jobs 1753135939.0 ♥ 5
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policynone
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_n4cppti","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"rdc_n4eaxw7","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"rdc_n4e6ajq","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"frustration"}, {"id":"rdc_n4e1lkx","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_n4f6qcc","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"} ]