Raw LLM Responses

My own experience is that ChatGPT (and Ai in general) is not bad, but it's not great. It can write and draw and code and carry on a conversation, but it has no idea what's important. Give it a summarization task and more often than not it will seize on some minor detail while missing the whole point of the story. It doesn't intuit, it merely gives the illusion of intuition. And it's very good at bluffing. I use Ai nearly every day in my job and in my personal life. It's a great sounding board for ideas and it is a fine replacement for a search engine. But it is nowhere near human. People give it far too much credit, and *that* is the problem. *People* are the ones who are elevating it to some kind of wise oracle, or demon imposter. They do this with humans too: some talk show host or outspoken celebrity can be elevated by his peers and considered a thought leader. Just look at what they did with Trump, a human GPT who is out of context and badly hallucinating. Or, they assume he's some dark, diabolical villain who is playing 11th dimensional chess, when actually he's just an idiot. The problem as I see it is that ai as an industry is unregulated and only self-governed. We need stricter laws to establish a baseline for both ethics and veracity. If we're going to trust it then it needs to be accountable.