Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
They want you to believe that every ditch digger out there can become a robot ma…
ytc_Ugw__-Dsh…
G
Instead of utilizing computer generated artificial intelligence, they relied on …
ytc_UgwXGZjSw…
G
Im sorry but if i see a driverless car, im not getting in. Yall take care.…
ytc_UgwkgS365…
G
While we bicker about privacy and AI, China is growing in power and technology. …
ytc_UgzDuMsGp…
G
Not to mention that they are so busy developing ways to steal from artists that …
ytc_Ugw75B1bj…
G
Now men know know what it was like when we women were little girls and played wi…
ytc_Ugw8Uhb4b…
G
These corporations need to fund and pay for their own infrastructure rather than…
ytc_UgzIDFqkJ…
G
You are actually so smart for this, i hope more people do this as well so that w…
ytc_UgztZiAZI…
Comment
There is no paradox, you've presented a false dichotomy.
"Dumb" and "Smart" are not mutually exclusive in this context. The AI is "dumb" in the dimension of generalized, conscious intelligence (it has no self-awareness, beliefs, or desires). It is "smart" in the dimension of executing tasks it was trained on (pattern recognition, data synthesis, text generation) at a massive scale.
A chess computer is "smarter" than any grandmaster but is not conscious, and no one would ever claim it was. The confusion with an LLM arises only because its output isn't a set of chess moves, but natural language.
An LLM does not understand, it manipulates statistical relationships between tokens.
It does not need to understand to generate coherent and useful text.
Therefore, no one should be confused into thinking it is a conscious or intelligent entity.
Regardless, it will take jobs. Many many jobs.
reddit
AI Moral Status
1751008131.0
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_mzy7ii3","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_mzzqgze","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_n00wnmq","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_mzxqwlu","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_mzxx2ne","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}
]