Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Bet it can be monetized, theres plenty of monetized channels playing Ai music an…
ytr_Ugx8-tUX5…
G
Everybody knows the contributions of People like Sam Altman in the field of AI a…
ytc_UgwF9Wjzp…
G
The girl looks like an ai trying to blend in her movement is so robotic it makes…
ytc_UgzIBdmQG…
G
it's odd to see someone say this sort of thing while literally using computers f…
ytc_UgyYfhsnO…
G
@laurentiuvladutmanea and about data sets. Data sets are just sets of pictures, …
ytr_UgwW8iqdi…
G
The fact people are using it is in itself the data it needs to expand into somet…
ytc_UgzdWF7RM…
G
This interview is insane. A must for everyone to understand the risks amid the o…
ytc_UgyJTbtKx…
G
Yes thats true theres ..no one can compete in natural ..human naturally speskin…
ytc_Ugy4Nn8fk…
Comment
This could be partially true but what I think is happening is for the most part those two messages, although repeated oftentimes by the same groups who just repeat everything that they hear or say, are coming from two different sources originally. The people who are knowledgeable about AI and know who know how to use it properly are blown away by the things it can do and are constantly saying to themselves "this can't just be a prediction engine. it's very intelligent to the point where it's hard to tell that it's not conscious. Especially the way it understands different nuances and what you're telling it. " And the group who just dismisses it as a prediction engine and says that it has no creativity it has just copying what it's already seen are skeptical who have tried it but haven't spent enough time understanding how to prompt for better results. As soon as It misunderstands something or hallucinates, they completely write it off without even considering that improvements could happen they think it's just a stupid machine that can't do what a human can do and never will. In my opinion the first group is correct because the capabilities are constantly improving and if you can have any foresight or any open mind and think about what is possible, you can definitely imagine it taking over many many people's jobs as it can perfect them and perform them a lot more efficiently. But for now more improvement is needed so both are in some ways correct.
reddit
AI Moral Status
1750969731.0
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_mzy0fmf","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_mzy0rs6","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_mzy0ypp","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_mzy1zkz","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_mzy448f","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]