Raw LLM Responses

I agree with most of what you wrote, but the first part is based on a dangerous myth: that billionaires need to pay workers so they can consume. That was true in the past, under mass industrial capitalism. But not anymore. The only reason billionaires pay workers is to extract value (profit) from their labour. As long as they need humans to do the work, they must keep them alive so they can keep working the next day. Food, shelter, medicine. But once AI and automation can do that work better and cheaper, there’s no economic reason to employ humans. And without a function, there’s no reason to keep them alive at all. The factories making mass-market goods are dependent on us consuming. They will go away or change. But new factories will thrive: robot factories, drone factories, private jet assembly lines, surveillance systems. Bezos and Musk want spaceships, for example. They’ll trade with each other to build these, not with us. This will be an economy that exists without us. A system where we are not needed. Revolutions have always depended on workers having leverage, when their labour still mattered. It wasn’t the homeless who overthrew kings and CEOs. It was people with some power, acting collectively. Today, workers can strike and halt the world. Soldiers can refuse to fight. That is real power. But an unemployed person cannot strike. Someone made irrelevant by AI cannot bargain. If we stop cooperating when we’re no longer needed, nothing happens. And if we become inconvenient, they can even murder us, and it won’t cost them anything. Think of how migrants are treated. The system doesn’t yield to pleas. It only yields to threats to its function. But you can’t threaten a system that has no dependency on you. That’s the danger we’re walking into: not mass revolt, but mass irrelevance. The moment to organise is now while we still have some power left. Not when the skies and streets are patrolled by ai-drones. And it’s not that billionaires are evil really. Th