Raw LLM Responses

Exactly. It helps but there’s so much context needed in what you’re doing it would be impossible for laymen to accomplish anything. So many times I’m telling the LLM: hey that function doesn’t actually exist, or that option doesn’t actually exist. Or you know I would love to do it this way, but this is totally not secure. Or this will work for xyz, but in my case I need to integrate with abc. Does this handle xyz? Will it also account for this dependency? This looks like an antipattern, can we try again? Shouldn’t it look something like “abc”. So many things a manager or whoever would be stumped by immediately. This doesn’t change the need for devs, it just changes the way we do development. I’m glad people are finally coming around because I’ve been sure of this for at least the past year or two.