Raw LLM Responses

> It has absolutely enhanced my output but it cannot replace humans just yet. With the operative word there being "yet." It really feels like discussions of this topic are an even mix of four groups of people: those who believe that this will be catastrophic in the short term and refuse to see the problems with the technology, those who believe that this will be catastrophic in the medium term and acknowledge that the technology is not yet at a place where people can't be retrained into other jobs as the technology is adopted and improved, those who think in the long term and see that even if it takes a hundred years *eventually* this is going to cause a fundamental shift in the way we view labor, and those who think AI is awesome and don't care about what happens more than a few months from now. AI cannot outright replace devs, *yet.* But it can reduce team sizes over time by enabling higher productivity from individuals, many of whom work in positions that cannot simply scale up and do more work with the same amount of people. And in the long term, assuming the technology doesn't hit an unforeseen wall, it'll be able to do anything a human can and there will be no advantage whatsoever to having a human doing a job over a robot that can work 24 hours a day. We need to reign in the doom and gloom over the short term and start preparing for the medium-to-long term.