Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
This is a recurring question on these kinds of posts and just kind of ignores the fact that the current economic system is incredibly unequal in terms of income and spending/economic activity. The bottom third, those most likely to be replaced by warehouse robots, robotaxis, self-driving trucks, call center AI, etc, make up only a tiny percentage of economic activity, with some data showing they make up less than 10% of total economic activity.  The top 10% of people spend about half of all the money spent every year.  If you expand that out to the top third, you reach something like 65% of all economic activity and with the top half reach 85%+. All that to say, a 10% increase in spending from the most well off 35 million people would  more than replace even an 80%-90% decline in spending from the least well off 110 million.  I'm not advocating for this, to be clear, merely pointing out that "but who will buy things" isn't as strong an argument as you might think.
reddit AI Moral Status 1746730848.0 ♥ 1
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningutilitarian
Policynone
Emotionresignation
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_mr2buri","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_mr3xcjq","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_mr2y5uh","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_mr43mst","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_mral524","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"} ]