Raw LLM Responses

Watermark removal isn't really a new thing, and this seems like a rather inefficient way to go about it. > Removing a watermark without the original owner’s consent is considered illegal under U.S. copyright law (according to law firms like this one) outside of rare exceptions. Did the reporter read the stack exchange page they link to? Its not illegal if it falls under any of the myriad of copyright exceptions. Also, the law firm they link to clearly states that its only illegal in some circumstances (in standard legal speak). > Claude calls removing a watermark from an image “unethical and potentially illegal.” I guess they got their knowledge of US law from another LLM lol