Raw LLM Responses

>SAG-AFTRA chief contracts officer Ray Rodriguez said that the bargaining companies initially wanted to offer protections to voice, not motion performers. “So anybody doing a stunt or creature performance, all those folks would have been left unprotected under the employers’ offer,” Rodriguez said in an interview with Aftermath. >Rodriguez said that the companies later extended protections to motion performers, but only if “the performer is identifiable in the output of the AI digital replica.” >SAG-AFTRA rejected this proposal as it would potentially exclude a majority of movement performances. I dunno, man. I can sympathize with voice actors, or actors whose face gets put in a game via motion capture. But if e.g. the game company motion captures "6-ft barbarian swinging axe", they need the actor's permission (and the actor gets paid again) if they later want to scale it to "4-ft halfling swinging axe"? That seems a bit extreme.