Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Its the consumers fault.
First LLM was created as a tool and the creator said i…
ytc_UgzCUgPLu…
G
Its just a setback, AI will get better for a lot more than they got just hit…
ytc_UgzKgRGos…
G
Theres more behind making good photos that takes years to master, ai "artists" a…
ytr_UgyiA3lJX…
G
Interesting. It seems AI will be great at uncovering some possible very old symb…
ytc_UgxYDiRrP…
G
You can tell if photos are ai most of the time so if this happens to you my advi…
ytc_UgxTHsmTE…
G
It's funny. But as with whole lot of funny jokes about "ai bros' it's not true. …
ytc_UgxjI05IK…
G
You have to treat AI as a tool. And with that you need to know that it doesnt sp…
ytc_UgxckoosU…
G
That's why it's the Co-Pilot not the Pilot. Also, I mean, we're all kind of stat…
ytc_Ugz65zRD-…
Comment
Thanks for the interesting background on it. I'd imagine that the difference on this one would be Open AI directly monetizing the results of its scanning of materials. Do you know of case law that would deal with that aspect specifically?
reddit
AI Governance
1719549461.0
♥ 15
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_lalundc","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"rdc_lamu7iv","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_laol8l2","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_lamzmd8","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_lamr2dp","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]