Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
Should be an easy win in the court. Also: [https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/individual-rights/individual-rights/rights-related-to-automated-decision-making-including-profiling/](https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/individual-rights/individual-rights/rights-related-to-automated-decision-making-including-profiling/) This easily falls under "solely-automated decision-making with significant effects" for the person. It is largely a case of data processing malpractice. The article is full of troubling quotes, like: >Her bag was searched Well, did it search itself? Who performed the search and on what legal basis? I reckon if it were me, I'd deny anything, keep my stuff to myself and just wait for the police. By the way, I think the EU is right on this one: [https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20240308IPR19015/artificial-intelligence-act-meps-adopt-landmark-law](https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20240308IPR19015/artificial-intelligence-act-meps-adopt-landmark-law) Automatic face recognition brings more problems than it solves.
reddit AI Surveillance 1716903847.0 ♥ 467
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilityunclear
Reasoningdeontological
Policyliability
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_l6a1uyw","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_l60uypo","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_l60xt73","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"rdc_l614rhz","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_l65ft4s","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]