Raw LLM Responses

>On the contrary, they're driven by a sense of altruism, not greed. Most of the AI nerds I've met aren't looking to grab up anyone's money. They tend to have more enough of their own > >Instead, they're unsatisfied with the current (or perhaps the previous) state of the world. There was this intractable poverty, and even the best logistics, collection, and distribution methods they could come up with was not cutting the mustard. People were and are starving to death, or dying of disease, or of war, or what have you even supposing that your finger is on the pulse of the AI computer engineering world, what does any of this have to do with how the technology will be or is being implemented, or even with what specific AI technologies are developed? this is an extraordinarily naive train of thought as is everything that follows, even if you suppose that people are generally conscious of their own motives and able to accomplish whatever they set their minds to with relative ease. two assumptions even less credible than that intellectual laborers have any real agency over what technologies get developed. what did nuclear physicists in the late 1930s-40s generally want to do with nuclear fission? what technologies did they want to develop? when they ended up developing bombs instead, what did they want to see done with them? how does any of that relate to what happened? come on! you're clearly an intelligent person, do a little thinking