Raw LLM Responses

>I don’t want to get a lawyer involved or be a nuisance to the school, I just want to get a fair grade on my paper. I will escalate if needed but only as a last ditch effort.> *All clients (students & parents) in education law litigation have said this one way or another at some point.* First of all, the reason to have a lawyer advocate for you early on in this matter is so that you do not become a nuisance to the school. Nuisance requires time + frustration. By having someone that knows what they are doing, and frankly scares the shit out of these power tripping jerks, is that it short-circuits the situation. The school will want the matter to disappear asap if you have a lawyer. Think of a lawyer/advocate as simply the right tool. The school will likely focus more of their frustrations onto the lawyer than a student (in other words shifting the burden to them rather than you). Don't worry, lawyers are used to adversaries calling them tools. **My main point is** meet with an education attorney this week. The longer this decision stands the stronger it is. Almost always, initial consultations with attorneys are free. This is not you filling a lawsuit against the school. **This is you hiring a lawyer to show up for a meeting, or make a phone call, or writing an email, that lays out that they are in the wrong.** It is likely that it will cost a slight fee, much lower than you'd expect. **IF YOU DID CHEAT** they would still have to prove it. As almost every other comment has stated, AI detection tools suck dick. If this paper was a vast deport from your prior assignments, you'd be in tougher spot- but not impossible- but yeah I could see it swinging either way then. Finally, just an aside- you're almost the fuck out of high school, who the fuck cares if you piss them off. They clearly didn't mind pissing you off and threatening your future prospects. Fuck 'em.