Raw LLM Responses

It's actually a failing of academia on a lot of levels. Essays shouldn't really be a large enough percentage of people's grades to fail them regardless of if they're able to write one that demonstrates that they read and understand the material. A lot of these classes wind up being a studying of the value of a student's ability to write on a subject, rather than their actual proven understanding of the subject material. It doesn't have to be accurate, so long as it is 'well written', which is what most AI aims to do. Using 'Tools' to fail students who use AI is just as big a fucking failing, tbh. The tools themselves are normally AI, prone to significantly worse results than OP is at the ass end of (Literally the teacher gives one example, claims the wording is too similar and throws a zero on it) and also, most importantly, these tools literally say "Hey, don't use this to grade, because it is so bad." And then they do it anyway, and put people's lives at stake on an AI generated coin toss to absolve themselves of blame. There's going to be an uptick this year in 'excess deaths' and it's literally going to be a "Suicide due to getting bricked from university over a false-positive AI-generated zero". I hate it here. I hope these schools get with the program before someone with more money than them are able to spin this as "See? Schools ARE useless!" rather than the actuality, "Schools don't have enough funding to adapt to change anymore, and they get outmoded yearly while relying on shitty coping mechanisms."