Raw LLM Responses

They’re literally putting you in a position where you are being asked to defend yourself against someone who claims their evidence is 100% true and accurate Google the term burden of proof - their assertion that you can defend yourself against this by proving you HAVEN’T plagiarised is a common logic trap and a poor tactic used in debate - you cannot prove a negative - for example how can I unequivocally prove to you I don’t have a fluffy pink dressing gown that I wear only on weekends and call myself Lady FooFoo while wearing it? If you suggest you have evidence that I do this, how can I possibly prove that I don’t beyond reasonable doubt? The same can be said by your teachers assertion of plagiarism. They have asserted that they BELIEVE you have plagiarised, but beyond their “gut feeling” which they also say in their email, they have no evidence. They used ChatGPT to write answers for them and then compared that output against other students work as a way to prove wrong doing. Your teacher even says that your essay didn’t fully match the output but they FELT it was too close to be your work. For examples of this argument being debunked in the real world, you can look at court cases around music composition (Ed Sheeran very recently). Courts have agreed that creativity doesn’t happen in a vacuum and as such plagiarism or copyright infringement in this case is exceedingly difficult to prove If you have not plagiarised, gather all the evidence that you have around your sources used for the essay and perhaps even a save history if you have it if the file as others have suggested. During the review with your principal you must ask for all evidence that your teacher has gathered that proves your guilt - and any subjective evidence must be disregarded, if your principal or teacher tries to assert their “experience” as evidence you must ask for this to be discounted as it’s a common logical fallacy (appeal to authority) and only rely on accurate and provable fact