Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
You bring up an interesting point! The interaction in the video highlights how w…
ytr_UgxF0Xx7A…
G
7 billion wouldn't be able to do a voice actors role in a video game, but traini…
rdc_lgrelt9
G
Love the channel! Even have my wife watching, laughing, and saying Lizzid Peeple…
ytc_UgztdyRDa…
G
My issue with someone like Sam is that they found a comfort zone that allows the…
ytc_Ugz_AM5ej…
G
Vous vous souvenez d'un film qui s'appelle "terminator" et d'autres !?
Voilà ce …
ytc_UgwD6D11t…
G
This needs to stop, using other peoples artwork like this is illegal, immoral, a…
ytc_Ugw4qfXvv…
G
doctors and surgeons will go after basically 95% of all jobs can be done by ai…
ytc_UgyUT4geP…
G
What a lot of these companies fail to think about or even realize is that AI is …
ytc_Ugz7bpJwB…
Comment
The burden of proof is not yours. It’s always on the accuser. Taking a single phrase and using that as evidence is ridiculous. They didn’t even manage to provide any evidence at all to accuse you of anything. You should simply state that you did not use ChatGPT to write your work and that they’re mistaken. “Similar phrasing because that’s all I can do my job is harder now yo” is NOT evidence.
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1704606907.0
♥ 311
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_kgqc6es","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_kgpfbmb","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_kgpf363","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_kgp2u2p","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_kgp8myh","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]