Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Its fucked up that they would believe facial recognition software over the obvio…
ytc_UgwCXkwfT…
G
I think the 'doomsday' already happened, back when smartphones and other 'smart'…
ytr_UgxlAH1eK…
G
Lmao u must be special thinking thats a real robot bruh them fools trying to do …
ytc_UgzOsl2gX…
G
it is a very good thing for equalizing.... inequality between the poor and rich …
ytc_UgwNfgL4U…
G
Beyond AGI is where this video gets ridiculous and click baity. How does AI gain…
ytc_UgwJdY0h7…
G
I have a wonderful hairdresser! I cannot imagine this profession could be done b…
ytc_UgyiVOVii…
G
If Sasha used AI properly, it would tell her that CO2 does not have the impact t…
ytc_Ugx-q7SCG…
G
I think the part that constantly fails in these conversations about how to teach…
ytc_Ugxs4e2UN…
Comment
The burden of proof is not yours. It’s always on the accuser. Taking a single phrase and using that as evidence is ridiculous. They didn’t even manage to provide any evidence at all to accuse you of anything. You should simply state that you did not use ChatGPT to write your work and that they’re mistaken. “Similar phrasing because that’s all I can do my job is harder now yo” is NOT evidence.
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1704606907.0
♥ 311
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_kgqc6es","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_kgpfbmb","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_kgpf363","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_kgp2u2p","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_kgp8myh","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]