Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G >whatever....because you dont need to pay them salaries and money is all that… rdc_m6y5dja G How are they gonna do that? If the gov wana regulate big tech then the politici… ytc_UgxiGXgod… G i hope they keep driverless cars its not pricy at all its gonna ruin a good thin… ytc_Ugxd3wE1d… G Humanity is a stain on LIFE. So what I mean, is that, there is not much of any… ytc_UgwC6M6an… G Then stop consuming any kind of content from actors or writers. If you could car… rdc_jtb3q8d G yes AI doesn't have a worldview, or beliefs, or the ability to reason like we ca… ytc_Ugwf0e4y1… G What about actors? Will we want to watch AI bots? If we take away income earning… ytc_Ugyf3Ufyh… G @humanharddrive1 Why? If we refuse to completely scapegoat AI and acknowledge h… ytr_UgyJuvfU1…
Comment
This is dumb. Yes, nuclear weapons control, but banning AI in drones? That's really going to handicap us. No algorithms for security camera drones to learn their own routes, among other incredibly-useful-and-completely-not-dangerous uses. And does anybody really think both sides are gonna just not research this shit anyways?
reddit AI Governance 1699827995.0
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningutilitarian
Policynone
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_k8xu5v5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_k8zlnoi","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_k8wnm1t","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_k8woq3r","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_k8wwp7w","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"} ]