Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
"OpenAI faces more turmoil as another employee announces she quit over safety co…
rdc_l5kktle
G
THIS!!! ai can pull stuff out of its ass but my dad works with ai so he trusts i…
ytr_Ugzc63Y-p…
G
such regulations might rather promote the growth of open source ai which might e…
ytr_UgywW6P6r…
G
Ai reminds me of somebody. I just cant place who. Hmmm?
Are we this stupid …
ytc_UgzN-50sf…
G
I don’t even use my own name but I’ve found chatbots (in my experience) also usu…
ytc_UgyPX71my…
G
I'm just here to say: there isn't one slightly intelligent AI out there and I'm …
ytc_UgxQ_iFrv…
G
I have no "fear" of AI trying to get rid of humans because of their "inferiority…
ytc_UgwkL2crj…
G
@MrEmmanuel3737
Notice how there's no shadow from the robot? No matter how muc…
ytr_UgzKIOI-D…
Comment
but producers DO get credits (justified or not)
this ruling would seem to say they should not simply because AI was utilized in the process.
no IP is produced, therefore *producers* are non-value added.
reddit
AI Governance
1692477394.0
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_jwvub49","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_jwvc4d9","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_jww1eu7","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_jww8i2g","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_jwwp0s5","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}
]