Raw LLM Responses

Hey folks, I'd suggest people read [the decision](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.243956/gov.uscourts.dcd.243956.24.0.pdf) itself - it's only 15 pages and pretty readable. Then read the US Copyright Office's [guidance](https://www.copyright.gov/ai/ai_policy_guidance.pdf) for registering AI works (9 pages). The short version: In a case where a computer conceives of, and executes a work, it is not protectible by copyright since the work as not created by an "author" within the meaning of the Constitutional provision (Article I, Section 8) empowering Congress to pass laws securing to authors their writings. Where AI is used as a tool by someone to create a work it's still protectible by copyright, however the AI part may not be included in the work's copyright depending on fairly fact-specific aspects of the work creation. This has more or less been the Office's position since 1965, when the issue was first raised involving computer-generated works where the human author separated themselves from the final creation via a random number generator.