Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I like you guys and I dislike AI, in general. But this video is not well done. Y…
ytc_UgykuyM4r…
G
anyone who drives full electric rc toys are very selfish people in my opinion th…
ytc_UgxDXFQvv…
G
You are just lazy if AI is working in "unfamiliar areas" in your point of view. …
ytr_UgzhDN-rw…
G
people worrying about their jobs while our actual existance has never been so at…
ytc_UgyKMNbPY…
G
@hendrikdebruin4012 while it's not currently like a human, look at AI's response…
ytr_UgzyNrJyP…
G
I looked him up on LinkedIn, he has an “institute” and he worked for Google as a…
ytr_UgyMHE8XQ…
G
Lets talk about the real issue here: they spelled "absolute" wrong.
>its an …
rdc_czl7cak
G
Is this the difference between human general intelligence vs artificial intellig…
ytc_UgxXi6OOY…
Comment
> They own the art, and therefor the training data, they created the AI, they trained it, and they own the IP for the character - logically it seems difficult to argue that they shouldn't be able to copyright the output.
I don't see how any of that is relevant. They didn't create the output, so it's not theirs.
reddit
AI Governance
1692460765.0
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_jwv8cc3","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_jwv1zn7","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_jwvfz8t","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_jwv8qee","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_jwysji6","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]