Raw LLM Responses

This is why when we decide good systems around humans we tend to get more than one human's input. Things like review processes, juries, and even old fashioned democracy tend to have better results than their individualist counterparts. Yes, there are limitations to this (and if you want a larger discussion on managing those limitations I'd suggest reading James Surowiecki's "Wisdom of Crowds"). Democratizing AI isn't something we've reached yet, and without it the systems we put AI in become more brittle. If humans are the problem across the board, it's a problem for AI as well, which is created, managed, and distributed by humans. AI can itself be seen as a democratization of human knowledge, which is good, but to say it doesn't have the downsides of manipulation, dishonesty, and agenda is to ignore that it is a human endeavor. These are implicit in it. And look. There are a lot of problems with humans. There's a lot of good with humans, too, and to judge us only on our problems is unjust. In spite of all our problems, we do find that we rely on other humans' decisions all the time, and our lives are better for it - humans today live longer and healthier because we can rely on both the good and bad past decisions of other humans who built our society to what it is. Your decision to remain a member of this society implicitly and categorically agree with that, because you feel you'll survive better with other humans than not.