Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@holdensRHM
I watched the Zuck's interview with Lex Friedman and it didn't seem…
ytr_UgzILEF6c…
G
Awesome tutorial! If you’re not checking AI suggestions with AICarma, you might …
ytc_Ugz2bhmgf…
G
This is way beyond wrong! Enough no more! People need a safe place to disclose. …
ytc_UgyqFUKHV…
G
@mimah1015 You must be a kid or just incapable of understanding how the world wo…
ytr_UgyIiHSn_…
G
More than 4 years people have been photoshopping celebrities on naked bodies eve…
ytr_UgztMuEEs…
G
Sorry I wont support it. I understand Ai in some instances but this isn't one of…
ytc_UgyhHogkL…
G
IF FSD was better I'd expect FSD robotaxis to be driving around by now. Like Way…
ytr_UgwWwExMT…
G
They will figure out the most efficient way to remain powered and then implement…
ytr_Ugzed5qjB…
Comment
i think this censorship is heavily dependent on asking it 'edgy' content. i use GPT-4 for explanations on scientific theories, programming languages and logical concepts as well as extensive code writing and have never had issues as you describe.
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1681482994.0
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"rdc_jg7tn5r","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"rdc_jg7r38b","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"rdc_jg7nxaa","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"rdc_jg8bd7h","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"rdc_jg8f98c","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}]