Raw LLM Responses

I think the idea of finding useful info others have created has value. I get what Google is afraid of it replacing the search engine. Let’s get back to logic and rational for a moment. It’s logical that humans can produce better original content, that is true. The problem is that users can’t always access this content or know how to. We’ve created this endless internet with endless information, and yet people have created man-made echo chambers and silo themselves off from the bulk of the information. Why is it that someone chooses to doom scroll for hours reading the same unoriginal bullshit time after time. An Ai that can breach the barrier and pull content from outside the echo chamber would still be introducing new content to people who would otherwise never see it. It would be like your parrot, except for he gets to visit another family every other weekend, only to return with new information that WILL be unique to the original family. So I think there’s value in that. —- I do agree there is a pitfall of new information ceasing to exist once people homogenize too much. Then one echo chamber becomes a big one. But I think given enough people, there’s always that “human spirit” that’ll speak their voice among the machines, and that voice will become part of the system as well. Thinking about it makes me more hopeful to be honest. Since the robots can’t create new info, but instead rely on the intentionality of humans, it’ll be like a ghost inside the shell. Those who hear the whispers will understand the soul from the echo. People falling for cults and bullshit is nothing new. Those who can rise above will always find a way. You can’t silence that.