Raw LLM Responses

I made a [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/vcrds5/the_hard_problem_of_ai_consciousness_the_problem/icin46i/) somewhere else in this thread explaining why I don't think it is unreasonable to not believe AI can be conscious. The gist of it is that I guess I disagree with this point: >(for no explicable reason, just a gut feeling) The reason for me is that I know I am conscious. I can't prove others are, but the fact that humans and animals with brains are similar gives me at least some reason to expect there is a similar experience for them. AI is something that operates using a completely different mechanism however. If I express it kinda scientifically: I can observe this: * I have a biological brain, I am consciousness and I am intelligent (hopefully, lol) * Humans/Animals have a biological brain, humans/animals are intelligent * AI has binary code, AI is intelligent Because I am the only thing I know is conscious, and biological beings are more similar to me than AI is, in my opinion it is not unreasonable to make a distinction between biological and machine intelligence. Also I think it is more reasonable to assume that consciousness is based on the physical thing (brain vs binary) rather than an emergent property like intelligence, but I'll admit this might be biased logic. This was longer than I planned on making it lol, as I said though the other comment I made has other details, including how I'm also open to the idea of Pan-Psychism.