Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
I don't know what this headline is supposed to be implying... we're not surprised when an epidemiologist tells us that 4% is not enough to achieve herd immunity right? But then maybe it's a: "Hey, 'lots of people' in Wuhan got sick but only 4% have antibodies!". Implying that maybe a majority of people got the virus but only 4% actually still have antibodies? But then the article goes on to say: "**The prevalence of antibodies found in this study suggests that more people actually may be infected with COVID-19 than what is reported in the case figures, which document those who test positive for the virus after experiencing symptoms".** So 4% was higher than reported... I mean I know under reporting definitely happened but I sort of doubt 80% of people in Wuhan got it with only 1-2% reported cases...
reddit Cross-Cultural 1603509530.0 ♥ 2
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningunclear
Policynone
Emotionunclear
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_g9u6zlc","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"unclear"}, {"id":"rdc_g9ufiwk","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_g9ufs4c","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"unclear"}, {"id":"rdc_g9usho8","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_g9uzew4","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"unclear"} ]