Raw LLM Responses

I don't know what this headline is supposed to be implying... we're not surprised when an epidemiologist tells us that 4% is not enough to achieve herd immunity right? But then maybe it's a: "Hey, 'lots of people' in Wuhan got sick but only 4% have antibodies!". Implying that maybe a majority of people got the virus but only 4% actually still have antibodies? But then the article goes on to say: "**The prevalence of antibodies found in this study suggests that more people actually may be infected with COVID-19 than what is reported in the case figures, which document those who test positive for the virus after experiencing symptoms".** So 4% was higher than reported... I mean I know under reporting definitely happened but I sort of doubt 80% of people in Wuhan got it with only 1-2% reported cases...