Raw LLM Responses

No mention of universal basic income? How is more free time possible without it? This isn't rocket science. If machines are doing the work, then humans need a source of income, independent of work, to buy all the goods the machines produce. If not? If basic income stays at $0? Then there is no automation. It doesn't matter how advanced technology gets. We can always keep doing what we've already been doing: using macroeconomic policy to create unnecessary jobs (mostly, [service jobs](https://i.imgur.com/cxy8oHw.jpg)), as an excuse to pay people wages. We've had all the technology we've needed to ***begin*** automating the economy's production, and use less labor, for at least a century. We haven't, because of our society's normative assumptions about what people deserve money for. We are obsessed with work and wages, and remarkably tolerant of poverty for anyone who fails to navigate the labor market. Either we believe humans are entitled to more prosperity with less work, or we don't. That's up to us. There's no technology that will save us from having to make the decision to end poverty.