Raw LLM Responses

> the radiologists themselves will likely spend less time manually reviewing images and will instead focus on improving radiographic techniques and handling edge cases. I think you're mis-understanding why many of them get into the field. It's predominantly overrun by people who want and can make a fuckton of money with minimal overhead and effort. Once you have an efficient technique down you can pull in upwards of $1m annually in a public system like Ontario's Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) - who knows what you can do in private practice in the US. There's not a single radiologist I know who wants to devote their time to improving techniques and handling edge cases, because that hits the bottom line and they have bills to pay. I wish I was being a pessimist but I'm closely associated with a number of radiologists and people who did radiology through med school (but chose other specialties), and the one constant (aside from surgeons being egomaniacs) is that radiologists are extremely well paid considering they sit in a dark room at home most of the time. There are exceptions such as fellows and others who work at teaching hospitals, but it's glib to say "they'll just focus on other stuff!" - if it's anything like other specialties whose livelihoods have been threatened by technological process, they will bitch and moan about radiology needing a human eye and will endeavour to keep the status quo as long as possible.