Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
I agree with you. What we need is not a ban on this technology, but heavy regulation on what data is stored and what processes are allowable, and what the threshold is for evidence in prosecutions. The cat is out of the bag when it comes to facial recognition. There's open source software called OpenFace that literally anyone can implement. It's not going to go away. But we can put controls on the judicial side of the law enforcement. I think I'd be okay if it were used to find leads, but not be allowed as evidence itself. That is to say, it might help you spot a murderer near the scene of a murder, but the false positive rate means that alone can't be evidence on its own, but investigators could use that footage as a lead to find other supporting evidence. Lotta pitfalls to be considered though.
reddit AI Harm Incident 1548819103.0 ♥ 7
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningutilitarian
Policyregulate
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_efbclsp","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"rdc_efbxajl","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_efbmbzx","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_efbqo8p","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_efbo48z","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"} ]