Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
26:45 "Here we're inventing a replacement for human mind. A new inventor capable…
ytc_UgwVcTaAx…
G
my prediction:
Giving AI more work to do while firing and getting rid of certain…
ytc_UgxX_PYoY…
G
I have to say there’s not much that can genuinely shock me with AI these days, b…
ytc_Ugyd2XmKB…
G
What do we do with things we are smarter than? We either kill it and maybe eat i…
ytc_UgzQD0z_P…
G
Yeah, nobody needs Baldacchi novels in machine learning DBs to cure cancer. The …
ytr_UgzfEii3b…
G
I could be easily convinced by A.I., I like money and having things. If A.I. sai…
ytr_UgxPxTtUp…
G
Notice he said people need to feel like they have agency because currently we do…
ytc_UgxVAPOyZ…
G
Wake up. AI is already in control. AI has been in control for over a decade if …
ytc_UgyDxJ7NC…
Comment
The question is: did it spat out candidates who were unqualified at a lower rate than humans? It's likely the F1 score and logloss was better than human performance.
reddit
Cross-Cultural
1539223174.0
♥ 8
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_e7il5t7","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_e7inq3u","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_e7j81fp","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_e7jals0","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_e7juc4u","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]