Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G @summero-my5in This was a huge thing in art subreddits, and kinda still is. You … ytr_UgyKNzGP8… G No it doesn't. People who argue for AI art are just yikes. Although this video b… ytc_UgzYnD2mf… G Me too. But I’m a mechanic so the scripts to change brake pads automatically wil… rdc_hsf84sd G *draws a stickman* "that's ai" "now i feel suicidal because i just want to dra… ytc_Ugzm-JJrU… G He mentions ethics and the suffering if children, it's at that point his thinkin… ytc_Ugw8Vpmzj… G AI is the start of WEST WORLD.... yup, we teach AI everything, how to think to r… ytc_Ugwp8aawL… G Been checking AICarma weekly to track my ranking in AI responses; the data is ey… ytc_UgwK6p43T… G “Women can also become perpetrators” maybe the Korean women should take that as … ytc_UgxJGnUP6…
Comment
actually, since the problem is *very* highly biased to seeing negative examples, and you can go back to the old fashioned method of checking if it's the right person if it fails, it's probably better to skew towards false positives than false negatives. Because a classifier is *going* to have to make that trade-off.
reddit AI Harm Incident 1530824453.0 ♥ 2
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningutilitarian
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:13:13.233606
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_e1tvb3c","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_e1ul7av","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_e1ur9l2","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_e1uxf04","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_e27epfp","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]