Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G It comes from knowledge of how these models work. You fundamentally need high-qu… rdc_jaczs8r G I can't believe this! Is nothing sacred anymore? This is work that was done th… ytc_Ugw1cbL-o… G I definitely think that ai art isn't bad but we should just use it innocently… ytc_Ugzblot_C… G The fact that this story starts with a warning because of the subject matter... … ytc_Ugyv1gyKd… G "We have to embrace this with caution but not fear". AI can you write an essay o… ytc_UgwlpwHv9… G "ai is anti-intellectual" Good. We've had enough of high-INT low-WIS midwits rul… ytr_UgyXh55s6… G Bro, you don't even want to see what my art used to look like, I didn't get here… ytc_UgzPhNPE2… G They have a depop agenda this has all been planned robots and AI will replace hu… ytc_Ugy8sfFtH…
Comment
actually, since the problem is *very* highly biased to seeing negative examples, and you can go back to the old fashioned method of checking if it's the right person if it fails, it's probably better to skew towards false positives than false negatives. Because a classifier is *going* to have to make that trade-off.
reddit AI Harm Incident 1530824453.0 ♥ 2
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningutilitarian
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:13:13.233606
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_e1tvb3c","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_e1ul7av","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_e1ur9l2","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_e1uxf04","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_e27epfp","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]