Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Climate has always changed, which is what the word means, really. But this sums … ytr_UgzxmpOyf… G ​@amxThortween not all ai users are like that dawg. I've never met an ai artist… ytr_UgxjgNKHx… G ​@zephyriasDepends on the animation style. A 3D one like this is hell to try and… ytr_UgwPaRCEw… G You’re slowing down the progress. AI is here. Deal with it. Learn to use it rath… ytc_Ugx73ansa… G You sound like my mom. BTW, I wrote this myself. Didn't even use my Claude Opus … rdc_odx27g5 G seems like sm just letting it happen they must have people in sm that perv for I… ytr_UgwT2FH3v… G YESS!!! I hate ai art, its SO important we fight against it!! basically everythi… ytc_UgxBLgjJs… G If AI removes jobs more than it can create then won’t companies lose out on prod… ytc_Ugz9Lptuh…
Comment
actually, since the problem is *very* highly biased to seeing negative examples, and you can go back to the old fashioned method of checking if it's the right person if it fails, it's probably better to skew towards false positives than false negatives. Because a classifier is *going* to have to make that trade-off.
reddit AI Harm Incident 1530824453.0 ♥ 2
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningutilitarian
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:13:13.233606
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_e1tvb3c","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_e1ul7av","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_e1ur9l2","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_e1uxf04","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_e27epfp","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]