Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G My personal approach to dealing with ai art thieves is one i call digital isolat… ytc_UgyHuPKeL… G It's fascinating to think about the advancements in technology and how robots mi… ytr_UgxZ13qwB… G No it won't, as an avid user of AI it's good but it has its limitations, we'll s… ytc_UgyCuCExg… G Behind artificial intelligence there is nothing demonic in itself. But behind hu… ytc_UgyJDSjid… G HELP THE THING WAS SO CLOSE TO BREAKING THE FILTER BY ITS SELF YESTERDAY. I WAS … ytc_Ugw5sfLZA… G This is a literal ad for AI. Misinformation and clickbait, end to end. Don't buy… ytc_Ugy9SNL7X… G This is just another conspiracy theory. AI will never be able to kill anyone unl… ytc_Ugw6EgaI8… G *The "good old days" were not really so good.:* Yeah, we need to bring back thos… ytc_UgySYQqnW…
Comment
To be fair, the chief is completely comfortable with LEGAL sides of facial recognition. I don't think she is particularly fond of the idea that there are 98% false positives. Obviously it's still early stages and doesn't work well, but she knows it will be better in the future. No need for pitchforks quite yet IMO.
reddit AI Harm Incident 1530798947.0 ♥ 5
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilityunclear
Reasoningunclear
Policyunclear
Emotionunclear
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"rdc_e1u2s2w","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"rdc_e1u1ro5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},{"id":"rdc_e1ty22v","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},{"id":"rdc_e1ug5vo","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"rdc_e1txamo","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"})